2025 US Treasury security auctions
16 April 2025 - Written by ML
This report examines the US Treasury security auction market for 2025. Details on each auction can be accessed on the Treasury website(U.S. Department of the Treasury, 2025).
We present here various statistics for US treasury securities issued in 2025. We look specifically at: quantum of issuance, level of demand, and, buyer type.
Our data set is comprised of past auction results for calendar 2025. Data was downloaded by python in the form of JSOn file and imported into R. It was then formatted so that field data matched its characteristic form (numeric, factors, characters). Analysis began with a summary of the various security types which is shown below.
| Summary of Total Accepted by Security Type (2025 year to date) | |||
| Security Type | Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Percent of Total Accepted (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | 104 | 7607 | 85 |
| Note | 23 | 1171 | 13 |
| Bond | 9 | 161 | 2 |
| Total | 136 | 8939 | 100 |
For the year to date there has been 136 securities issued for $8.9 trillion. Of these bills (terms less than 1 year) represent the most sizable issuance type of around 85% ($7.6tn) of total issuance. Coming next are notes (1-10 year term) that contribute 13% or $1.1tn and bonds of $161 billion.
| Treasury Records Summary (2025 year to date) | |||||||||
| Security Term | Bill Count | Note Count | Bond Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Average Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-Day | 1 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 12 |
| 14-Day | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 14 |
| 4-Week | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1284 | 75 | 95 | 86 | 85 | 28 |
| 33-Day | 1 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 33 |
| 42-Day | 7 | 0 | 0 | 585 | 75 | 85 | 84 | 85 | 42 |
| 6-Week | 9 | 0 | 0 | 667 | 70 | 84 | 74 | 73 | 42 |
| 8-Week | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1224 | 75 | 90 | 82 | 80 | 56 |
| 13-Week | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1340 | 76 | 92 | 84 | 83 | 91 |
| 17-Week | 16 | 0 | 0 | 929 | 60 | 64 | 62 | 60 | 119 |
| 26-Week | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1174 | 68 | 79 | 73 | 73 | 182 |
| 52-Week | 4 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 48 | 51 | 50 | 50 | 364 |
| 1-Year 10-Month | 0 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 674 |
| 1-Year 11-Month | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 702 |
| 2-Year | 0 | 4 | 0 | 251 | 32 | 76 | 63 | 72 | 730 |
| 3-Year | 0 | 4 | 0 | 271 | 59 | 74 | 68 | 69 | 1094 |
| 5-Year | 0 | 4 | 0 | 223 | 72 | 77 | 74 | 74 | 1822 |
| 7-Year | 0 | 3 | 0 | 140 | 45 | 48 | 47 | 46 | 2557 |
| 9-Year 10-Month | 0 | 3 | 0 | 112 | 19 | 48 | 37 | 46 | 3587 |
| 9-Year 11-Month | 0 | 1 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 3622 |
| 10-Year | 0 | 2 | 0 | 75 | 21 | 54 | 37 | 37 | 3642 |
| 19-Year 10-Month | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 7230 |
| 19-Year 11-Month | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 7261 |
| 20-Year | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 7292 |
| 29-Year 10-Month | 0 | 0 | 2 | 53 | 26 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 10897 |
| 29-Year 11-Month | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 10927 |
| 30-Year | 0 | 0 | 2 | 42 | 10 | 32 | 21 | 21 | 10949 |
| Total | 104 | 23 | 9 | 8941 | 10 | 95 | 50 | 48 | NA |
Within these broad categories (bills, notes and bonds) securities are issued with different duration. An indication of that is seen in the table which presents debt securities from the shortest term (1 day) to the longest term (30 years) with total issuance and other aggregated metrics (such as the minimum, maximum, average size of each issue).
Insight: The majority of the US$8.9 trillion invested in 136 securities[^1] are bills with a term of less than a year followed by notes (1-10 year) and then bonds (over 10 years).
In the following section are tables that examine what share of issuance is from reopened or newly issued securities. And then tables that exclusively look at Bills, Notes and Bonds.
| Reopened Securities Summary (in Billions) | |||
| Security Term | Accepted (Reopened) | Accepted (Not Reopened) | Average Days (no) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12-Day | 40 | 0 | 12 |
| 14-Day | 100 | 0 | 14 |
| 4-Week | 1284 | 0 | 28 |
| 33-Day | 65 | 0 | 33 |
| 42-Day | 585 | 0 | 42 |
| 6-Week | 667 | 0 | 42 |
| 8-Week | 1224 | 0 | 56 |
| 13-Week | 1340 | 0 | 91 |
| 17-Week | 0 | 929 | 119 |
| 26-Week | 294 | 880 | 182 |
| 52-Week | 0 | 200 | 364 |
| 1-Year 10-Month | 28 | 0 | 674 |
| 1-Year 11-Month | 31 | 0 | 702 |
| 2-Year | 0 | 251 | 730 |
| 3-Year | 0 | 271 | 1094 |
| 5-Year | 77 | 146 | 1822 |
| 7-Year | 0 | 140 | 2557 |
| 9-Year 10-Month | 112 | 0 | 3587 |
| 9-Year 11-Month | 40 | 0 | 3622 |
| 10-Year | 0 | 75 | 3642 |
| 19-Year 10-Month | 14 | 0 | 7230 |
| 19-Year 11-Month | 13 | 0 | 7261 |
| 20-Year | 0 | 18 | 7292 |
| 29-Year 10-Month | 53 | 0 | 10897 |
| 29-Year 11-Month | 22 | 0 | 10927 |
| 30-Year | 0 | 42 | 10949 |
| Total | 5989 | 2952 | 2845 |
Among the classifications treasury uses to distinguish securities is whether they are fresh newly issued securities at auction or are reopened securities. Grok speculates that the reason for opening pre existing securities for fresh capital could be for operational, market and debt management reasons. For example when a 10 year note issued two months ago may be reopened which results in a fresh note of 9 years and 10 months. That increases the outstanding amount for that specific security while avoiding the need to create a new issue.
Insight: Some 67% of dollars invested ($5.9tn) is for reopened securities. Of those reopened securities 85% is from five Bills with terms: 13 weeks ($1.3tn); 4 week ($1.3tn); 8 week ($1.2tn); 42 days ($0.6tn); and, 6 weeks ($0.7tn). For freshly issued securities ($3tn) a combination of 5 notes and bills make up 80% of invested dollars: 17 week ($0.9tn); 26 week ($0.9tn); 3 year ($0.3tn); 2 year ($0.2tn); 52 week ($0.2tn).
| Bills Only Summary - Treasury Records | |||||||
| Security Term | Bill Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Avg Duration (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13-Week | 16 | 1340 | 76 | 92 | 84 | 83 | 91 |
| 4-Week | 16 | 1284 | 75 | 95 | 86 | 85 | 28 |
| 8-Week | 16 | 1224 | 75 | 90 | 82 | 80 | 56 |
| 26-Week | 16 | 1174 | 68 | 79 | 73 | 73 | 182 |
| 17-Week | 16 | 929 | 60 | 64 | 62 | 60 | 119 |
| 6-Week | 9 | 667 | 70 | 84 | 74 | 73 | 42 |
| 42-Day | 7 | 585 | 75 | 85 | 84 | 85 | 42 |
| 52-Week | 4 | 200 | 48 | 51 | 50 | 50 | 364 |
| 14-Day | 2 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 14 |
| 33-Day | 1 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 33 |
| 12-Day | 1 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 12 |
| Total | 104 | 7608 | 40 | 95 | 68 | 73 | 89 |
Insight: 85% of dollars invested ($7.6tn) is for Bills. The top 5 are: 13 weeks ($1.3tn); 4 week ($1.2tn); 26 weeks ($1.1tn); 8 weeks ($1.2tn); and, 6 week ($0.7tn). The broad single issuance range for these is between $60-95bn with the median range between $60-85 bn.
| Notes Only Summary - Treasury Records | |||||||
| Security Term | Note Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Avg Duration (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Year | 4 | 271 | 59 | 74 | 68 | 69 | 1094 |
| 2-Year | 4 | 251 | 32 | 76 | 63 | 72 | 730 |
| 5-Year | 4 | 223 | 72 | 77 | 74 | 74 | 1822 |
| 7-Year | 3 | 140 | 45 | 48 | 47 | 46 | 2557 |
| 9-Year 10-Month | 3 | 112 | 19 | 48 | 37 | 46 | 3587 |
| 10-Year | 2 | 75 | 21 | 54 | 37 | 37 | 3642 |
| 9-Year 11-Month | 1 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 3622 |
| 1-Year 11-Month | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 702 |
| 1-Year 10-Month | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 674 |
| Total | 23 | 1171 | 19 | 77 | 47 | 46 | 2048 |
Insight: 12% of total dollars invested is allocated to Notes. The top security terms (by total accepted) are: 3 year ($0.3tn), 2 year note ($0.25tn); 5 year ($0.25tn). Single issuance values range between $30-77 bn. While median range is between $69-74 bn reflecting somewhat smaller average issuance sizes as terms extend.
| Bonds Only Summary - Treasury Records | |||||||
| Security Term | Bond Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Avg Duration (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29-Year 10-Month | 2 | 53 | 26 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 10897 |
| 30-Year | 2 | 42 | 10 | 32 | 21 | 21 | 10949 |
| 29-Year 11-Month | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 10927 |
| 20-Year | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 7292 |
| 19-Year 10-Month | 2 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 7230 |
| 19-Year 11-Month | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 7261 |
| Total | 9 | 162 | 10 | 32 | 19 | 20 | 9093 |
Insight: Approximately 2% of total dollars invested is allocated to bonds with the greatest allocation to 30 year. The range of issue size is between $10-30 billion. And median size is between $21-26 billion.
Within the categories of Bill, Note and Bond there are cash management bills within bills, floating rate notes, and, treasury inflation protected securities that are issued as notes and bonds.
Grok suggests the purpose for cash management bills is to smooth out uneven cash flows such as tax receipts or large expenditures. The bills have a less than one year duration and between 2018-2025 there have been $19tn issued representing 16% of total bills and 13% of total issued securities.
| Treasury Records Summary for CMB (2025 year to date) | |||||||
| Security Term | Bill Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Average Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42-Day | 7 | 585 | 75 | 85 | 84 | 85 | 42 |
| 14-Day | 2 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 14 |
| 33-Day | 1 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 33 |
| 12-Day | 1 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 12 |
| Total | 11 | 790 | 40 | 85 | 60 | 58 | NA |
Insight: During the period some 11 cash management bills were issued for $0.8tn. The top ranked durations were 42 days ($0.6tn); 14 days ($0.1tn); and, 33 days ($65 billion). The median issue size for these bills is between $40-85billion.
A separate category of security issued as notes are floating rate notes (FRN). In this security interest payments fluctuate as interest rates change. And so as interest rates rise the security’s rate will rise and offer higher returns.
| Treasury Records Summary for FRN (2025 year to date) | |||||||
| Security Term | Note Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Average Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Year | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 730 |
| 1-Year 11-Month | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 702 |
| 1-Year 10-Month | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 674 |
| Total | 3 | 91 | 28 | 32 | 30 | 31 | NA |
Insight: Relative to the scale of other treasury securities FRNs are a small percentage of total issuance (1%). Two years is the common duration. And the issue size ranges between $28-32 billion.
Treasury Inflation Protected securities (TIPS) aim to provide protection against rising inflation. Features of these securities is that the principal value adjusts based on changes in the consumer price index (principal increases with inflation and decreases with deflation). Interest payments are calculated on the adjusted principal. TIPS are issued as notes for the most part and bonds and represent a small percentage of total securities issued by the government (less than 1% of total).
| Treasury Records Summary for TIPS (2025 year to date) | ||||||||
| Security Term | Note Count | Bond Count | Total Accepted (Billion) | Minimum Accepted (Billion) | Maximum Accepted (Billion) | Average Accepted (Billion) | Median Accepted (Billion) | Average Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-Year | 1 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 3636 |
| 9-Year 10-Month | 1 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 3577 |
| 30-Year | 0 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10944 |
| 5-Year | 1 | 0 | 0 | Inf | -Inf | NaN | NA | 1811 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 50 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 19 | NA |
Insight: the majority of TIPS are issued with a 5 year and 10 year term. And the median size for each issue ranges between $10-21 billion.
The 13 week bill is among the most frequent issued security. Since the start of 2025 there have been $1.3tn reopened bills issued and no fresh issued bills. We collate the securities by month and plot the trends.
| 13-Week Bills: Frequency and Total Accepted by Month and Year (Year to date 2025) | ||
| Month | Count 2025 | Accepted 2025 (Billion) |
|---|---|---|
| January | 5 | 447 |
| February | 4 | 346 |
| March | 4 | 306 |
| April | 3 | 241 |
| Total | 16 | 1340 |
Insight: There are around 4 issues of the 13 week bill per month. The monthly amount raised has varied between $300-450billion in 2025 to date.
Insight: The latest auction result (14th April auction with issue date of 17th April) showed an above average bid to cover ratio at 2.96 when compared to the median and mean for the series of 2.86. That suggests the bond attracted stronger than usual demand.
We next examine the pattern of demand by distinguishing between competitive bids (by primary dealers, direct bidders and indirect bidders that include foreign and international monetary authorities who place bids through a direct submitter) which are used to set the price for the auction, non competitive bids (that include awards to treasury retail, foreign and international monetary authorities and other non competitive bidders), and, the system open market account (SOMA) which represents the federal reserve.
| Average Allocation by Investor | |
| 13-Week Bill Auctions (2025 bills to date) | |
| Investor | Average Allocation |
|---|---|
| Primary Dealer (own house account) | 0.340 |
| Direct Bidder (own house account) | 0.058 |
| Indirect Bidder (including foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.529 |
| FIMA Noncompetitive (foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.000 |
| Treasury Retail Noncompetitive | 0.014 |
| Other Noncompetitive | 0.012 |
| SOMA (managed by Federal Reserve) | 0.046 |
| Total | 1.000 |
Insight: For the 13 week bills issued in 2025 to date most bidders are indirect with an allocation of 53%. Primary dealers are the next significant bidder taking up 34% of issues. Direct bidders have taken 6%, SOMA 5% and non-competitive bidders the remainder.
| Allocation Variability by Investor | |
| 13-Week Bill Auctions (2025 to date) | |
| Investor | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|
| Primary Dealer (own house account) | 0.061 |
| Direct Bidder (own house account) | 0.014 |
| Indirect Bidder (including foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.061 |
| FIMA Noncompetitive (foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.001 |
| Treasury Retail | 0.001 |
| Other Noncompetitive | 0.001 |
| SOMA (managed by Federal Reserve) | 0.026 |
Insight: Indirect and primary dealer bidders show highest variability in allocation (6.1%), indicating significant fluctuation in their participation. SOMA shows some variability (2.6%) with other bidders showing low variability in allocation percentage.
| Central Tendency and Spread by Investor | ||||
| 13-Week Bill Auctions (2025 to date) | ||||
| Investor | Median | Q1 | Q3 | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Dealer (own house account) | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.370 | 0.070 |
| Direct Bidder (own house account) | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.070 | 0.020 |
| Indirect Bidder (including foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.530 | 0.500 | 0.580 | 0.080 |
| FIMA Noncompetitive (foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Treasury Retail | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.000 |
| Other Noncompetitive | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| SOMA (managed by Federal Reserve) | 0.050 | 0.040 | 0.060 | 0.020 |
Insight: Primary Dealer and Indirect Bidder categories have the highest median values (0.35 and 0.53, respectively), indicating higher central tendency values compared to other categories. SOMA and Direct bidders have median vales of 0.05. Other bidders have median values close to 0, suggesting minimal or no activity in these categories. The Interquartile Range (IQR) is highest for Indirect Bidder (0.08), indicating more variability within this category compared to others.
The Z score is a metric to show how the allocations by bidder in the latest auction compares to historical norms. In so doing it provides insight into the relative performance of each investor type.
For this analysis the data is filtered to get the latest auction result. Then the mean and standard deviation of the allocation for each bidder type is computed. The z scores are then derived using a formula where the latest allocation for each bidder is subtracted from its mean allocation and divided by that bidder’s standard deviation.
| Z Scores by Investor | |
| Latest Auction Allocation Z Scores | |
| Investor | Z-score |
|---|---|
| Primary Dealer (own house account) | −0.657 |
| Direct Bidder (own house account) | −1.275 |
| Indirect Bidder (including foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 0.856 |
| FIMA Noncompetitive (foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 2.914 |
| Treasury Retail | 1.135 |
| Other Noncompetitive | 2.106 |
| SOMA (managed by Federal Reserve) | 0.010 |
Insight: In the latest auction Primary Dealers had a lower-than-average allocation. Indirect bidders a higher than average allocation. Direct Bidder were significantly lower in allocation. Higher than average allocations registered by FIMA and other non competitive bidders.
Primary Dealer (own house account): Z-score: -0.657 indicates that the allocation for Primary Dealers in the latest auction is 0.647 standard deviations below the mean. That suggests that Primary Dealers had a lower-than-average allocation in the latest auction.
Direct Bidder (own house account): Z-score: -1.275 indicates that the allocation for Direct Bidders in the latest auction is 1.275 standard deviations below the mean. This suggests that Direct Bidders had a slightly lower-than-average allocation in the latest auction.
Indirect Bidder (including foreign & intl monetary authorities): Z-score: 0.856 indicates that the allocation for Indirect Bidders in the latest auction is 0.856 standard deviations above the mean. This suggests that Indirect Bidders had a slightly higher-than-average allocation in the latest auction.
Percentile ranks convey how each investor’s allocation in the latest auction compares to their historical allocations.
| Allocation Percentile Ranks by Investor | |
| Latest Auction Percentile Comparison | |
| Investor | Percentile Rank |
|---|---|
| Primary Dealer (own house account) | 31.2 |
| Direct Bidder (own house account) | 6.2 |
| Indirect Bidder (including foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 75.0 |
| FIMA Noncompetitive (foreign & intl monetary authorities) | 100.0 |
| SOMA (managed by Federal Reserve) | 37.5 |
| Treasury Retail | 87.5 |
| Other Noncompetitive | 100.0 |
Insight: The results show that Primary Dealers in latest auction had a much lower allocation relative to others in the year to date. A weak response was also registered by Direct Bidders. Indirect bidders achieved an allocation 75% above that of other 2025 auctions for the bill. The allocation for FIMA and other non competitive bidders was the highest so far year to date.
The code computes a 10 auction moving average for each investor. The latest auction result is then compared to that moving average to identify how the result compared to it. We see in the latest auction the marked deviation above the moving average for primary dealers.
| Latest Auction Comparison | |||
| Allocation vs. 10-Auction Moving Average | |||
| Investor | Allocation | 10-Auction Moving Avg | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Dealer | 0.300 | 0.326 | −0.025 |
| Direct Bidder | 0.040 | 0.059 | −0.019 |
| Indirect Bidder | 0.581 | 0.552 | 0.029 |
| FIMA | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Treasury Retail | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Other Noncompetitive | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| SOMA | 0.047 | 0.037 | 0.010 |
Insight: The primary dealer regression line (green) is sloping downward implying they have been receiving a smaller share of auction allocation in 2025 auctions to date. The latest auction result (blue line) while below the moving average was in line with trend. The indirect bidder facet shows an upward sloping trend implying greater participation by that investor group. The latest auction result was in line with trend.
In this analysis each auction is considered a “portfolio” or a vector of allocations across all investor types (that add to 100%). We then compare the latest auction allocation vector to the historical allocation vector and each past auction vector.
The cosine similarity and Euclidean distance metrics are calculated to examine the relationship between latest auction allocation and previous allocations. Cosine similarity is a metric that ranges from -1 to 1 and indicates how similar the direction of the latest allocation vector is to the historical average (with 1 indicating identical orientation). Euclidean distance metric provides a direct distance measure between vectors with a lower value indicating more similarity.
| Similarity Metrics | |
| Latest Auction vs. Historical Average | |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Cosine similarity (latest vs. historical average) | 0.994 |
| Euclidean distance (latest vs. historical average) | 0.073 |
| Similarity Metrics (Latest Auctions) | ||
| Cosine Similarity and Euclidean Distance for Recent Auctions | ||
| Issue Date | Cosine Similarity | Euclidean Distance |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-10 | 0.998 | 0.042 |
| 2025-04-03 | 0.992 | 0.088 |
| 2025-03-27 | 0.996 | 0.060 |
| 2025-03-20 | 0.992 | 0.085 |
| 2025-03-13 | 0.990 | 0.092 |
| 2025-03-06 | 0.983 | 0.121 |
Insight: The two metrics (cosine similarity of 0.994 and Euclidean distance of 0.073) indicate that the allocation proportions are similar. Overall the latest auction allocation appears consistent with past auctions since the cosine similarity is close to 1 and Euclidean distance is low.
A box plot is created for each investor showing the distribution of their allocations across all auctions of the 13 week bill. We mark the latest auction allocation as a distinct point.
Insight: The box plot highlights that the share of allocation for primary dealers is at the lower end of the interquartile range. While the indirect bidder allocation was at the upper end.
The chart aims to highlight how the latest allocation deviates from the average while showing variability. The mean allocation for each investor is shown for all auctions with error bars showing 1 standard deviation. The latest auction allocation is identified as a diamond in red.
Insight: Primary dealer and direct bidder’s allocation was within average. Indirect investor allocation was outside the average of auctions so far in 2025 and approaching more than one standard deviation above the average.
Time series analysis plots the allocation for each investor over all auctions as separate lines with the latest auction marked with a vertical line. The chart reveals trends in the shift of allocation between investors over time.
Insight: Primary and indirect investors dominate the 17 week bill. Indirect bidders share of allocation has been rising. Primary bidders is falling. The share of allocation by SOMA is fluctuating.
The plot shows the allocation profile across the seven investor groups with the latest auction result distinguished from the historical median allocations.
Insight: The chart highlights the sizable share of allocation between primary and indirect bidders followed by direct bidders. The relative less significance of non competitive investors and SOMA is clear.
In this analysis rows are auction count for the period that starts from 2018. Separate columns are shown for the different investor types and cell colors represent allocation sizes.
Insight: the chart highlights the dominant share by primary and indirect bidders. The red bar flags the latest auction’s allocation by investor. The stable color intensity for indirect bidders and primary dealers suggest stability over time in allocation. It is also clear from the chart that there has been intermittant but low share from Direct Bidders and SOMA for this security.
Conclusion on buyer type: There appears to be a steady uptick in allocation by indirect bidders in the 13 week bill.
[^1] For the period between 2025 to date